Rolling right along, I have now explained the bogus nature of global warming. I exposed the real driver of climate variations on earth and the driver of false perceptions about climate. Find that here.
Next I covered the most serious danger to the continuance of a habitable planet; a nuclear war. I showed that the same people who are threatening us all with nuclear war also drive the fake warming hypothesis, and why. Find that here.
Next I showed that these same people are often a cause of, or are at least complicit in, many of the other real threats to the biosphere. I briefly described the worst of these threats. All could be summed up under one cause; uncontrolled capitalist industrialism and the thwarting of democratic governance. Find that here.
I also promised to explain exactly what I mean by neoMalthusian and concisely recount the history of the “warming” hysteria. The old Malthus lived two centuries ago. He wrote a lot on the idea of population control.
He had a contemptuous view of the human race. He thought we would all breed uncontrollably until we overran the ability of the earth to feed us and then we would starve. He had ideas for limiting population growth which included deliberately propagating disease.
I think Malthus would have got on very well with the people who wrote the ‘Great Barrington Declaration’ about the ‘herd immunity’ approach to dealing with the covid pandemic. His ideas have certainly been admired from his time until this by holders of wealth and those who identify with them. These always believe there are too many people in the world who are not useful to them and who consume too much of the world’s resources.
Malthus’s ideas were evolved by Thomas Huxley in the mid nineteenth century, who linked them with Darwin’s ideas on evolution to help create the theory of eugenics. That is, that allowing the weak to survive burdened the world’s limited food supply and allowed weak genes to be passed on. These ideas were supported by wealthy families such as the Rothschilds who wanted to build a world government so that these ideas could be carried out.
These families founded institutions such as the Rhodes scholars, who would first get a good education from the fund. Then they usually went to work in governments all around the English speaking world to try to create a world government. These people created a lot of trouble, including two world wars.
After the second world war, Thomas’s son Julian convinced the globalist networks to try a different approach. He linked world government with ecology and founded the ‘Club of Rome’ in the 1960s to further that. The members of the club still had the same basic idea, that humans are a plague on the planet and our numbers should be greatly reduced.
They presented a much nicer image than that to the public. They said there were limits to growth and so population growth must be reduced to zero. They were partly right in this; the earth cannot sustain the endlessly expanding reckless economic exploitation of industrial capitalism.
They tried various ways of convincing the public all over the world that economic and population growth had to be frozen somehow. As I related in an earlier instalment of this, I remember the new ice age story. However, they discovered that the global warming story worked better for them.
It is like a Swiss army knife to the people who use it. Even the ‘seven sisters’ oil companies have become fond of it because it helps them to drive their competitors out of business. It helps to maintain imperialism by preventing poor countries from using their own resources to develop their own economies.
They have had three generations now, in which to work on this. It is disturbing that it is possible to brainwash the populations of most developed countries so thoroughly with something which cannot withstand ten minutes of serious reflection. However, they have never been able to actualize this delusion, and it is starting to slip away from them.
The thing is, most people with any intellect know under their hats that the whole thing is propaganda meant to create consent to unpopular policies. As long as it causes no serious problems for themselves, people will go along with it. But now it is starting to bite many people.
Resistance to global capitalism is growing. The most disappointing thing about this development is that much of the left have come to buy into the warming narrative. Here is another tool in the Swiss army knife; one that allows globalists to control opposition from within, as they like to do.
Many radical left groups find that the warming narrative fits with their own about the need to destroy capitalism. A few have been wise enough to see where the warming narrative originates from and its real purpose. Ending capitalism does not mean tearing down the infrastructures of civilization.
Opposition to the globalist agenda and the warming narrative also comes from right wing groups funded by industrial capitalists. It is linked into narratives about limited government and nationalism. These ideas do not offer people anything except, again, a tearing down of the infrastructures that enable civilized life.
The globalists might like to have much of this structure torn down. It would make it easier for them to achieve at least part of their goals. To restate, their goal appears to have been to create a world government, reduce the world’s population, and subject it to a rigorous control and to a eugenics program.
They will not be able to achieve a world government. They might be able to achieve part of their other goals. I am trying to predict the future.
However, what will lead to a better future for all is for people to see where the warming narrative is coming from and to reject it. We do not have to accept a drastic reduction in our quality of life. We need more democratic political and economic systems.
More democracy means an honest information system. So does management of our environment and resources to insure a healthy life for everyone. We need real science to be freed from ‘climate science’.