This follows from the first article in this series. If you haven’t read it, find it here.
I laid out the complete falsehood of the global warming hypothesis. I explained what actually drives temperatures on earth. I showed who is driving this disinformation and made some pretty good guesses at their motivations.
One motivation is to create a global government and manage resources so as to reduce the world’s population. The other is to create a diversion away from real dangers to the environment created by end stage capitalism. If the aim of reducing the population is to protect the biosphere from the degradation caused by overconsumption, the two aims are somewhat contradictory.
However, the western oligarchy is not monolithic. There are factions within. It is the ones who make their money from owning property who would like a preserved biosphere. The ones who make their money by producing goods are generally contemptuous of any ideas of limits to the earth’s capacity and want to maintain a large human herd.
However, a large part of these goods producers or industrial capitalists could come around to the idea of a reduced total herd and total output. They often show by their otherwise inexplicable behaviour that they are not so much interested in maximizing profits as in maintaining control of the working populations.
Thus, a good part of this industrialist class could go along with the neoMalthusian agenda. Many clearly do not and back much of the opposition to that agenda, especially the global warming trope. It does no good to back one of these factions against the other; they must both be eliminated.
Yet for now, the overuse of resources and the real threats to the biosphere continues. So does the campaign to convince people that use of fossil fuels must be drastically reduced to stave of a calamity. So does the effort to distract attention away from the former and to focus only on the latter.
The question is, how far can this go before something snaps and the public rebels against “extinction rebellion?” There is no evidence for the warming hypothesis. Anyone who has been alive for awhile knows that their local climate is not warming and is not changing drastically.
Almost everything happening that is cited as evidence of warming is as consistent with the earth cooling slightly. Or, results simply from mismanagement of land resources. Or, is simply false.
Yet the damage to the economy and to the standard of living is becoming evident. People are discovering that a modern, urban economy cannot be run by wind and solar power. Restriction of oil production will mean shortages of fuel, leading to supply breakdowns and economic decline.
However, like most mass brainwashing campaigns, the warming trope is ultimately based on intimidation. It is made socially and even physically unsafe to speak out against it. It is enforced by an army of true believer fanatics who will go after anyone contradicting the dogma.
This is a powerful network of thought police at work. They will insure that any academic who researches and publishes anything contradicting the official dogma will be making a career decision. ‘Progressive’ politicians will find it impolitic to publicly question the truisms of ‘warmism’.
Yet I believe most people keep it under their hat an uneasy suspicion that there is something wrong with the whole ‘warming’ thing. At some point the stupidity of the warming hypothesis will become too grotesque, and the harm and suffering it causes will become too much. Anger will overcome fear and people will demand that resources be directed to meet their human needs.
It is at this point that things will get interesting. Many things could happen and I will not try to predict the future. It could be the moment of greatest danger of the real threat to the survival of the planet; a nuclear war.
The same people who drive the ‘warming’ trope are also the biggest war mongers around. They want to set up a world government, so they will not tolerate any states existing outside their system. Several states on the planet have been acting independently of the globalists.
Two of these are very powerful and have strong militaries with nuclear capabilities. The very worrisome situation right now is that the states under the control of the globalists cannot defeat the independents, but seem unable to realize this. They are using their mighty propaganda machine to crank up a war hysteria against China and Russia.
I am not as hysterical as some about the danger of a nuclear war. But this danger must be recognized. It really could end the planets ability to support civilization at its present level, or in an extreme case end life on earth as surely as the ‘extinction event’ the climate fanatics imagine.
These ‘climate’ fanatics are often also wrapped up in the hysteria against the independent nations. But just as cooler heads are preventing crazy measures that could leave us freezing in the dark, the globalist powers are being boxed by sane leaders. Their ability to start trouble is being whittled away.
The twenties of this century are proving to be an anxious and trying time. I believe we will soon come into something better. The nuclear trigger will be removed from the hand of the globalists, thereby ending the single greatest danger to human kind.
This will likely also remove from them the ability to continue with the neoMalthusian nonsense. I have long predicted that a time will come when few people will want to admit to having been ‘extinction rebels’ or being taken in by the warming hypothesis. People will instead pay appropriate attention to the real environmental dangers looming around us.
In the next installment of this series, I will be getting into that.